Jen has some thoughts on Warren Buffet’s recent op-ed piece. Â My big problem with it is that Warren Buffet has a huge financial interest in bailouts and market recoveries. Â Do it because you think you should, not because he thinks you should.
Prediction: As this Presidential campaign continues, Barack Obama is going to continue to get himself in trouble by being asked simple questions and making impromptu statements. In Georgia on Tuesday he gave us all some great advice on raising kids:
Instead of worrying about whether immigrants can learn English â€” they’ll learn English â€” you need to make sure your child can speak Spanish.
Really? Is that what we should be doing? Is that what you’re doing Mr. Obama? Do your kids speak Spanish? (Disclaimer: Our kid is learning Spanish from her mom, but not because Barack Obama or any other asshat running for public office thinks it’s what we should do. It’s mostly so she and her mom can tell secrets and make jokes about me behind my back–at least that’s what the voices tell me.)
Seriously, what the hell does this have to do with running for President? Is this part of your platform–a mandate that everyone should teach their kids Spanish? Is this really part of your stance on immigration? Does it really consists of a component that tells parents which and how many languages their kids should speak?
Some advice–stop improvising and get back to your bread and butter–saying “change” every other word without any details about what this change will entail. When you start going off on random tangents about trivial things like policy you just confuse everyone.
It’s not fashionable to say so in the circles that Obama travels in, but the power and universality of the English language confirm and strengthen America’s way of life.
Exactly. And Obama is actually right about one thing–immigrants to the U.S. should learn English. But not because of some moronic legislation, and not because some politician suggested it. They should learn English because doing so gives them an economic advantage.
Just when you thought we were stuck without any real choices this election year, I’ve come up with an option. I’m beginning a grass roots effort to convince Maryland State Senator Clay Davis to throw his hat into the ring. It will take a lot of convincing and imagination to make this dream a reality, but if we all band together by purchasing a bumper sticker we have a shot at getting Mr. Clay elected.
Here’s a little bit of classic Megadeth for you, and something to think about this election year. This is one of the best metal songs ever, IMO. If metal isn’t your thing, at least watch enough of the beginning to get the gist and then forward the video to 2:15 for the payoff.
Whattaya mean I don’t support your system?
I go to court when I have to.
Welcome to the June 16, 2008 edition of carnival of local political gaffes. This is the first edition of the carnival, and there wasn’t much notice for submission, so contributions were light overall, but there is plenty of great stuff here, at least if you live in Tennessee.
TN House Majority Leader Gary Odom to get hitched–“He’s older than her parents, and she’s younger than his children, but at least the 56 year old House Majority Leader waited for the Capitol Hill intern and beauty queen to turn 24 before marrying her.”
So next week should be a little more extensive with submissions outside of TN as well. Submit your blog article to the next edition of carnival of local political gaffes. To submit an article just click here. Submissions are due by Sunday.
This along with countless other things that never seem to end here in good ol’ East Tennessee make it really hard to keep up with all the idiotic things local politicians do. I could do what I normally do (complain or nothing), but I’ve decided instead to do something fun with it.
Probably the biggest factor that keeps local politicians from being more than just local are the idiotic messes they get themselves into. The Carnival of Local Political Gaffes aims to shed light on these small timers and give them the credit they deserve.
There’s enough going on locally to make this Carnival fairly extensive. I can’t wait to find out what is going on in the rest of the country. Submissions are due by 6 pm on Sundays. If you’re interested in hosting the Carnival, contact me.
Right now, what Iâ€™m hearing is give McCain a shot if I canâ€™t have it so I can have it in 2012. I know she isnâ€™t saying that but itâ€™s the vibe Iâ€™m getting. I think Clintonâ€™s policies are basically the same as Obamaâ€™s. I think she is a savvy and clever woman, but if anyone is utilizing the tired Rovian playbook, itâ€™s Clinton.
With the three tick turds remaining in the two major parties, and the possibility that Mike Gravel or Bob Barr could be the LP candidate (I’m still trying to figure that one out), am I the only one who has a (very) small part of them secretly wishing that they could turn back time and vote for Bill Clinton? Oops, I guess it’s not a secret any more.
Sorry Slick Willie–I didn’t know how good we had it with you in office. Can Jimmy Carter run again? What about Billy?
When I got in my car today, Sean Hannity was on. I know, I know–but that’s the station I’d been listening to earlier. I’ve pretty much established what I think of him before, but what he and his guest, Bernie Goldberg, had to say today really drives homes those feelings. Although I don’t remember which one said it, the other was definitely in agreement. I’ll keep the quote to the part that I know is 100% correct so as not to unfairly portray these gentlemen:
“It’s bad for the country.”
Since you probably don’t listen to his show, you may wonder exactly what they were talking about.
Was it the federal government meddling in the education system? Was it the devaluation of our currency by the Federal Reserve? Was it the triumvirate of big government regulation-happy candidates to which they we have narrowed our realistic choices to?
Nope. Bloggers. But not every blogger is bad in their eyes, just those that disagree with them. Actually, they didn’t use the term “blogger”. I believe the phrase they used was “idiot with a computer and a modem.”
It seems that to Mr. Hannity and his guest, an idiot with a microphone has more right to an opinion than an idiot with a computer.
My favorite thing about free speech is that it allows me to speak my mind and spread my ideas if they are good. My second favorite thing about free speech is that it allows every idiot with a bad idea to expose himself as an idiot, and have his bad idea ripped apart.
For these reasons, I hope that Mr. Hannity and I both continue to enjoy the benefits of free speech.
National politics anyway. Local politics are never boring around here. Does anyone else feel like we’ve all just been beaten into submission? I’m not looking forward to any of the candidates still standing being President.
The article that appeared today in The New Republic was, of course,Â designed to be a hit piece–do maximum damage on an important day.Â Having said that…
It’s pretty obvious after reading that newsletters that Ron Paul is telling the truth when he says he didn’t write it.Â It’s funny, but I worked with a guy during the mid-90s that wrote newsletters/pamphlets and posted them around campus to “piss off as many people as possible”, and it sounds like something he would have written.
Having said that…
Claiming “moral responsibility” may be admirable, but it isn’t enough.Â If Ron Paul has a hope of saving his campaign and reputation he’s going to have to name the person who wrote the newsletters.Â Â The kind of person who would write things like this under Dr. Paul’s name in the first place isn’t the kind of person who would come forward at this point and claim responsibility.
If Ron Paul doesn’t name names soon, he’ll look like he’s protecting this person at the very least.