I’m talking about the broader sense of “rights”, not rights that are specifically listed by some document written by a bunch of 18th century lawyers. I’m talking about the concept of rights. How do you define that concept?
Do rights encompass all of the things you’d simply like to have? Are they the things that are necessary to sustain life? Are they the things necessary to live comfortably? Maybe everyone has a different answer. For me, the easiest way to answer the question is to consider the things to which I’m entitled. And for me, the things I have a right to end where the rights of others begin. I’m able to determine which rights I have by defining the rights, or entitlements, I don’t have.
I’m not entitled to anything that requires a sacrifice on the part of anyone else.
I may covet these things. I may try to trade for these things. I may wait for others to decide to give me these things. I may even try to convince someone to give me these things now. But I can’t take these things, at least not morally. Sounds reasonable enough, right? We can agree is true? If so, then we must also (by logic) agree that the contra positive is true. More specifically, I am entitled to anything that does not require a sacrifice on the part of someone else.
If that made sense, keep reading. If your brain is already scrambled by the terms “entitled”, “contra positive”, and “logic”, that’s cool. Just come back in a few hours…I’ll be posting another edition of “The Roost” later tonight. I pride myself on providing a little something for everybody.